FRESH Insights
  • Insights
  • Resources

Public Resources

What makes a carbohydrate food “healthy,” how experts and consumers each judge it, and the gaps between them.

A running list of our public-facing work on what makes a food “healthy” — and who gets to decide. It spans how expert rating systems score carbohydrate foods, how everyday consumers actually judge them, and the gaps between the two — the educational and communication priorities that follow. The IAFNS Carbohydrate Quality series and the peer-reviewed papers behind it, all open to watch or read.

Slide reading: The problem — too many health scores. The solution — harmonize them.

IAFNS Webinars

The IAFNS Carbohydrates Committee series opens with a consumer-research lead-in from NORC — how everyday Americans judge carbohydrate foods — followed by three webinars I presented on how expert rating systems score the same foods, and where experts and consumers pull apart.

NORC slide of consumer quotes on why deciding whether a food has carbohydrates is hard.
Lead-in · NORC for IAFNS

Carbohydrate-Quality Beliefs & Behaviors

NORC’s consumer research: what everyday Americans believe makes a carbohydrate food healthy — and why it’s so hard to judge.

Watch on YouTube →
Title slide: objectives of the meta-nutrient-profiling tool and healthfulness-impact charts.
Webinar · IAFNS · Josh Erndt-Marino

A Tool to Compare How Experts Rate Carbohydrate Foods

A meta–nutrient-profiling tool for seeing how different expert systems score the same carbohydrate foods.

Watch on YouTube →
Slide showing about 20% of carbohydrate foods and half of grains fall into gaps or uncertainty.
Webinar · IAFNS · Josh Erndt-Marino

Insights from the Tool Comparing Rating Systems

Where expert systems agree, disagree, and leave gaps — roughly 20% of carbohydrate foods, and half of grains, sit in uncertainty.

Watch on YouTube →
Bar chart of consumer misperceptions relative to experts, with alignment grades A through D.
Webinar · IAFNS · Josh Erndt-Marino

Alignment Between Experts and Consumers

Consumer perceptions set against expert ratings: 85% of foods land an alignment grade of C or D, and four are flagged as priorities.

Watch on YouTube →
With thanks to our collaborators
IAFNS — Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences

The Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences convened the Carbohydrates Committee behind this series.

iafns.org →LinkedIn →
NORC at the University of Chicago

NORC at the University of Chicago led the consumer focus-group research that opens the series with the public’s own view of carbohydrate healthfulness.

norc.org →LinkedIn →

Published Papers

Cover: An integrative framework to identify healthy, impactful and equitable foods, a case study on 100% orange juice.
Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. · 2023

The integrative food framework

A meta-framework that pools six nutrient-profiling systems to find foods that are healthy, impactful, and equitable — demonstrated on 100% orange juice.

Read the paper →
Cover: Educational gaps and communication priorities for the healthfulness of carbohydrate foods.
J. Am. Nutr. Assoc. · 2026

Educational gaps in carbohydrate healthfulness

Where public understanding of carbohydrate healthfulness breaks down — and the communication priorities that follow.

Read the paper →
 

FRESH — Fresh Food Recommendations · dietary surveillance and equity pipeline · drafted with AI assistance

Cookie Preferences